See new Tweets
Conversation
Brock Pierce
@brockpierce
·
Dec 7
I’m working with Yves and the ENF on a mutually beneficial proposal for B1 and Bullish’s consideration that would allow the ENF and the EOS community to take a leadership role in the future of EOSIO’s development and intellectual property.
@EosNFoundation
Brendan Blumer
@BrendanBlumer
·
Dec 7
Congrats on Helios Brock! We’re always keen to explore creative ideas that can maximize ecosystem growth.
Darkaudio
@darkaudio123
·
Dec 7
I see a scenario where we all look like geniuses, we all succeed, and the haters get snuffed out because everyone is successful, and happy.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 7
Please give us a reason to trust you, and take action.
This situation is a hinderance to #EOSIO growth and needs to come to an end. You are certainly welcome to participate in #EOSIO growth, but this open source movement that
@B1
started needs to live its own life now.
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 7
The #EOSIO IP should be in the hands of a not-for-profit entity or placed into the public domain for all to use.
This isn't about money, it's about lifting the burden and risk involved with IP when an entity like
@B1
has ownership of it.
"If you love something, set it free."
YC Buffett
@YCisbullish
·
Dec 7
#EOSIO belongs to the #EOS community
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 7
#EOS belongs to the #EOS community.
#EOSIO belongs to the entire #EOSIO community, with #EOS being a member of that.
But in reality both belong to
@B1
currently.
David
@davidnoname102
·
Dec 8
I agree with this. But is it really ok to try to take the IP by force? This is getting close to blackmail or theft.
YC Buffett
@YCisbullish
·
Dec 8
Social contract was broken first and numerous false promises are long gone now.
David
@davidnoname102
·
Dec 8
I still do not think it is ok to take someone else’s property by force as revenge. This sort of actions do not belong in the blockchain space.
EOS - Long Live The King
@ArtofExitScam
·
Dec 8
By force? By democracy
David
@davidnoname102
·
Dec 8
Just like the government take your stuff when they do not like what you do. Blockchain was supposed to protect us from this sort of things.
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 8
The IP can't be taken by force, and in this situation nothing was even taken. There were offers on the table for the IP, but not accepted after extending negotiations multiple times.
Brock Pierce
@brockpierce
·
Dec 8
Both sides were working together to come to an agreement with consent.
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 8
All that was needed was a statement of intention, and there was a deadline associated with it. The deadline moved multiple times. It wasn't going to keep moving forever.
There's zero trust in
@B1
, I can't blame anyone who didn't want to keep extending this deadline.
Brock Pierce
@brockpierce
·
Dec 8
The argument that the time-bound tokens were subject to a non-existent contract is a convenient excuse for undermining the integrity of the network.
Aaron Cox
@Jesta187
·
Dec 8
Those tokens were never in the hands of
@B1
. The entire concept that they own them is false. Those tokens existed in the eosio.stake account with a promise that
@B1
could vest them over 10 years.
No integrity here is lost and I'm happy to debate you or anyone on this subject.
Comments
Post a Comment